Bond Courts, Leeds

MEP Condition Survery and EPC Rating Improvement Report with staged plan for B rating by 2030
Discuss your project

With looming EPC legislation tightening around energy performance in commercial buildings, the owner of a prominent, multi-tenanted office building in Leeds sought expert guidance to navigate the evolving compliance landscape.

SEA Consulting was appointed to conduct a comprehensive MEP condition survey, coupled with a forward-looking EPC Rating Improvement Report.

Key objectives included:

  • Understanding the current state of the existing building services.
  • Developing a clear, cost-effective roadmap to meet future EPC requirements (minimum Band B by 2030).
  • Minimising disruption to tenants with upcoming lease expirations.

Initial Findings

Our survey revealed that the building’s services were based on a traditional 4-pipe fan coil system, with a D-rated EPC certificate. However, under revised 2022 regulations, this would now fall to an E rating. Although still compliant under current MEES regulations, is was significantly off the 2030 target.

Critical observations included:

  • 61% of the building’s carbon emissions were linked to heating—primarily due to an aging gas boiler.
  • Much of the MEP infrastructure was nearing the end of its economic life.
  • Distribution pipework was leaking and in need of major repair or replacement.

The Strategy

Using thermal modelling to assess the options. SEA Consulting proposed two viable upgrade strategies obtain a ‘B’ EPC rating: 

Option 1:            Retain the 4-pipe fan coil system, repair pipework, replace the gas boiler with a high-temperature air source heat pump, and plan upgrades to the terminal units and chillers.

Option 2:           Replace the 4-pipe fan coils with VRF Air conditioning system, on a floor-by-floor basis as they become available over the next 3-5 years, allowing the existing system to continually used until tenants could be relocated to newly refurbished floors as part of their lease renewals.

Additional enhancements factored into both options:

  • LED lighting upgrades throughout the building.
  • Refurbishment of the existing Air Handling Unit.

The Outcome

Following careful considerations and price analysis, Option 2 emerged as the superior solution. This saved them over £1.1 million in capital expenditure and reduced the building running costs by 38%, versus 24% less if they had chosen option 1. 

This allowed the owners to position the building to co comfortably meet or exceed the 2030 EPC Band B target. The phased installation mitigated tenant disruption and allowed new refurbished floors and lower running cost to be used as a incentive to sign new leases.

Bond Court, Leeds - Project Highlights

Project Cost Saving

Saved our client £1,169,950 in refurbishment cost by replacing existing MEP services.

Reduction in Running Costs

38% reduction in running costs by using more efficient building services.

SEA Consulting People Icon

Minimal Impact to Tenants

Individual plans created around each lease, minimising disruption to tenants.

Other Projects & Case Studies